Parliamentary Debate: Privilege Case Involving David Seymour

In a recent parliamentary session, Leader of the Opposition Chris Hipkins raised a point of order concerning the actions of ACT Leader David Seymour following an incident where Seymour drove a Land Rover up the steps of Parliament.

Point of Order Raised by Opposition Leader

Chris Hipkins contended that Seymour's behavior constituted a question of privilege. This was based on established practices indicating that comments about or questioning of the Speaker outside Parliament are considered privileged matters. Hipkins noted that Seymour had been told twice, before proceeding with his actions, that driving up the steps was not allowed.

The Speaker Responds

The Speaker addressed this concern by reviewing footage and communications related to the incident. It was clarified that Seymour had been informed by security personnel—not directly by the Speaker—that driving up the steps was prohibited. Following this clarification, an apology from Seymour was accepted. The Speaker noted that no formal claim of privilege breach had been submitted as required by Standing Orders.

Authority and Security Protocols Examined

Hipkins emphasized that security guards at Parliament act under the authority of the Speaker. He argued that any defiance of their instructions undermines this established order. In response, the Speaker supported the involved security officer, acknowledging his experience and judgment while expressing reservations about initiating a privilege case that might only lead to another apology.

Public Accountability Discussed

The debate also touched on public accountability. Hipkins argued for a formal parliamentary apology from Seymour beyond his apology to the Speaker. The Speaker indicated procedural constraints but acknowledged the importance of maintaining transparency and decorum within Parliament.

This session highlighted ongoing issues related to parliamentary conduct and the enforcement of established protocols, underscoring the delicate balance between individual actions and collective governance.