Fast-Track Approvals Bill: Committee Stage Debate Highlights

In a pivotal committee stage session on Wednesday, September 27, members of New Zealand's House of Representatives engaged in an intense debate over the Fast-Track Approvals Bill. The discussion primarily focused on clause 3, which outlines the bill’s purpose to expedite significant infrastructure projects, and raised critical issues regarding environmental considerations and Treaty obligations.

Purpose Clause Under Scrutiny

Rachel Brooking from Labour-Dunedin criticized the absence of sustainable management references within the purpose clause. She proposed an amendment to incorporate such language, arguing that this would ensure a balance between rapid infrastructure development and environmental stewardship. Brooking questioned whether excluding private projects might address concerns over perceived private benefits.

In response, Chris Bishop, Minister responsible for RMA Reform, rejected amendments related to sustainable management in the purpose clause. He emphasized that the bill aims to expedite infrastructure projects deemed crucial for regional or national benefits while maintaining environmental considerations. Bishop defended the inclusion of both public and private entities on the fast-track list, arguing against a strict dichotomy between them.

Environmental Concerns and Treaty Obligations

Debbie Ngarewa-Packer from Te Pāti Māori raised concerns about the exclusion of public input for projects like Trans-Tasman Resources. She proposed amendments to ensure adherence to Te Tiriti o Waitangi, emphasizing the need to safeguard Māori interests by ensuring inclusive consultation processes.

Hūhana Lyndon from Green supported Ngarewa-Packer’s stance, advocating for broader application of Treaty obligations beyond settled iwi. Her amendments aimed to guarantee protections for all Māori groups, ensuring their voices are heard in decisions affecting their lands and waters.

Infrastructure Funding and Housing Development

Rachel Brooking also addressed concerns about infrastructure funding and housing development delays. She suggested that medium-density zoning might be a more effective solution to New Zealand’s housing challenges than the current legislative approach.

The debate underscored ongoing tensions between development and conservation, as well as public interest versus private gain. The discussions highlighted complexities in legislating for economic growth while ensuring environmental responsibility and honoring Treaty commitments.